Taguchi Method-Based Synthesis of a Circular Antenna Array for Enhanced IoT Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Linear antenna arrays exhibit radiation patterns that are restricted to a half-space and feature axial radiation, which can be a significant drawback for applications that require omnidirectional coverage. To address this limitation, the synthesis method utilizing the Taguchi approach, originally designed for linear arrays, can be effectively extended to two-dimensional or planar antenna arrays. In the context of a linear array, the synthesis process primarily involves determining the feeding law and/or the spatial distribution of the elements along a single axis. Conversely, for a planar array, the synthesis becomes more complex, as it requires the identification of the complex weighting of the feed and/or the spatial distribution of sources across a two-dimensional plane. This adaptation to planar arrays is facilitated by substituting the direction θ with the pair of directions (θ,ϕ), allowing for a more comprehensive coverage of the angular domain. This article focuses on exploring various configurations of planar arrays, aiming to enhance their performance. The primary objective of these configurations is often to minimize the levels of secondary lobes and/or array lobes while enabling a full sweep of the angular space. Secondary lobes can significantly impede system performance, particularly in multibeam applications, where they restrict the minimum distance for frequency channel reuse. This restriction is critical, as it affects the overall efficiency and effectiveness of communication systems that rely on precise beamforming and frequency allocation. By investigating alternative planar array designs and their synthesis methods, this research seeks to provide solutions that improve coverage, reduce interference from secondary lobes, and ultimately enhance the functionality of antennas in diverse applications, including telecommunications, radar systems, and wireless communication.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".