MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406378385 · doi:10.14740/wjon1985

Methylation of <i>SOX1</i> and <i>PAX1</i> Are Risk Factors and Potential Biomarkers for Cervical Lesions

2025· article· en· W4406378385 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xiao Li, Li Wei Shao, Ai Jun Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Oncology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer-related gene regulation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGeneral Hospital of People’s Liberation Army
KeywordsMedicineMethylationEpigeneticsDNA methylationCancer researchOncologyInternal medicineBioinformaticsGeneticsGeneGene expressionBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The correlation between methylation of paired box gene 1 (PAX1) and sex determining region Y-box 1 (SOX1) with human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and the progression of cervical lesions is not well understood. This study aims to explore the potential value of PAX1 and SOX1 as diagnostic biomarkers for cervical diseases. Methods: A total of 139 cervical biopsy tissue samples were obtained from the Department of Pathology, the Seventh Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital from 2021 to 2023. The samples include 32 cases of chronic cervicitis (inflammation group), 30 cases of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL group), 50 cases of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL group), and 27 cases of cervical squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC group). DNA was extracted from paraffin-embedded tissues, and the levels of HPV infection and methylation of PAX1 and SOX1 were detected. Results: The methylation index (M-index) of PAX1 and SOX1 in the HSIL and CSCC groups is significantly higher than in the inflammation group (both P < 0.0001), with no significant difference between the LSIL and inflammation groups. There is no significant difference in the positive PAX1 and SOX1 methylation rate with HPV infection and age. The positive rates of PAX1 methylation in the inflammation, LSIL, HSIL, and CSCC groups were 3.13%, 10.00%, 44.00%, and 88.89%, respectively. The positive rates of SOX1 methylation were 3.13%, 10.00%, 40.00%, and 77.78%, respectively, and increasing with the progression of cervical lesions (R2 = 0.9189/R2 = 0.9279, P < 0.0001/P < 0.0001). Comparing LSIL, HSIL, and CSCC with the inflammation group and using cervical biopsy pathology diagnosis as the gold standard, methylation of PAX1 and SOX1 is a risk factor for HSIL and CSCC, with odds ratio (OR) values significantly increasing as lesions progress. The sensitivity of PAX1 and SOX1 methylation to cervical lesions increases with the progression of the lesions. Conclusions: Methylation of SOX1 and PAX1 is not associated with HPV infection. The positive rate of methylation for SOX1 and PAX1 is positively correlated with cervical lesions, which can serve as potential biomarkers for HSIL and CSCC. They are risk factors and potential screening indicators for HSIL and above cervical lesions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of OncologySame topicCancer-related gene regulationFrench-language works237,207