MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406378846 · doi:10.1002/rfc2.70014

The Role of Plasmapheresis in the Management of Severe Rhesus Incompatibility During Pregnancy: A Literature Review

2025· review· en· W4406378846 on OpenAlexaff
Wael Abdallah, Assaad Kessrouani, Malek Nassar

Bibliographic record

VenueReproductive Female and Child Health · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood groups and transfusion
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlasmapheresisMedicinePregnancyObstetricsCochrane LibraryMEDLINEPediatricsIntensive care medicineFetusMeta-analysisImmunologyAntibodyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Introduction To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of plasmapheresis in cases complicated by severe alloimmunization. Methods We reviewed multiple studies from databases like Medline, Embase, and Cochrane, looking specifically for research on ‘Rhesus incompatibility’, ‘plasmapheresis’, and ‘pregnancy’. After narrowing down, we included 46 studies that met our criteria to see how this treatment affected both prenatal and postnatal health. Results Out of 208 pregnancies analysed, about 22.1% sadly resulted in foetal loss, with one neonatal death. However, starting plasmapheresis as early as 3 weeks helped delay or avoid the need for Intrauterine blood transfusions in cases of severe foetal anaemia. Most of the babies born (77.4%) had positive outcomes, although many needed phototherapies after birth. Combining IVIG with plasmapheresis appears to be safe, with good postnatal outcomes. Conclusions Plasmapheresis shows promise as a treatment for severe Rhesus sensitisation, potentially reducing the need for Intrauterine transfusions and improving newborn outcomes. More studies are needed to refine treatment protocols and confirm these early findings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.513
Threshold uncertainty score0.541

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproductive Female and Child HealthSame topicBlood groups and transfusionFrench-language works237,207