MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406390299 · doi:10.1186/s13244-024-01895-2

Thoracolumbar fascia ultrasound shear strain differs between low back pain and asymptomatic individuals: expanding the evidence

2025· article· en· W4406390299 on OpenAlexafffund
Norio Tomita, Marie‐Hélène Roy Cardinal, Boris Chayer, Stacey Daher, Ameer Attiya, Nathaly Gaudreault, Guy Cloutier, Nathalie J. Bureau

Bibliographic record

VenueInsights into Imaging · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMyofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de SherbrookeUniversité de SherbrookeUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéFonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture
KeywordsMedicineAsymptomaticNeuroradiologyUltrasoundInterventional radiologyRadiologyStrain (injury)Low back painSurgeryAnatomyNeurologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Objectives To compare thoracolumbar fascia (TLF) shear strain between individuals with and without nonspecific low back pain (NSLBP), investigate its correlation with symptoms, and assess a standardized massage technique’s impact on TLF shear strain. Methods Participants were prospectively enrolled between February 2021 and June 2022. Pre- and post-intervention TLF ultrasound and pain/disability questionnaires were conducted. Cumulated (C|ShS| L ) and maximum (Max|ShS| L ) shear strain parameters were computed from radiofrequency data, and TLF thickness was measured on reconstructed B-mode images. Statistical analysis included linear mixed-effects regression. Results Thirty-two NSLBP participants (mean age, 57 ± 9 years [standard deviation]; 21 women) and 32 controls (51 ± 10 years; 22 women) ( p = 0.02) were enrolled. The mean shear strain was higher in NSLBP participants (C|ShS| L : 327.1% ± 106.0 vs 290.2% ± 99.8, p < 0.0001; Max|ShS| L : 8.1% ± 2.8 vs 7.0% ± 2.4, p < 0.0001) than controls, while mean TLF thickness (1.6 mm ± 1.0 vs 1.5 mm ± 0.9; p = 0.43) was comparable. Elastography parameters correlated with pain [C|ShS| L estimate [β], 0.01 [95% CI: 0.002, 0.02]; p = 0.02); Max|ShS| L [β] , 0.003 [95% CI: 0.001, 0.005]; p < 0.001)] and disability [C|ShS| L [β] 0.02 [95% CI: 0.005, 0.03]; p = 0.009); Max|ShS| L [β] 0.003 [95% CI: 0.001, 0.006]; p = 0.002)] scores. Neither C|ShS| L (β, 0.13 [−0.27, 0.53]; p = 0.53) nor Max|ShS| L (β, −0.02 [−0.10, 0.05]; p = 0.59) changed post-intervention. Conclusion Individuals with NSLBP demonstrated elevated TLF shear strain compared to controls, with similar TLF thickness. The shear strain correlated with pain and disability scores, yet a brief massage did not influence shear strain. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04716101. Registered 14 January 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04716101 . Critical relevance statement Ultrasound shows elevated TLF shear strain in lower back pain sufferers compared to controls. This correlates with symptoms, suggesting a role as a pain generator. Further investigation into its anatomy, mechanical characteristics, and pathophysiology is crucial for better understanding. Key Points Structural and mechanical alterations of the TLF may contribute to low back pain. Elevated TLF lateral shear strain was found in patients with NSLBP. A brief standardized massage therapy technique did not influence elastography parameters. Graphical Abstract

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.689

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInsights into ImagingSame topicMyofascial pain diagnosis and treatmentFrench-language works237,207