MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4406392927 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.2024-0498

Association Between Abatacept Exposure Levels and Infection Occurrence in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: Post Hoc Analysis of the AVERT-2 Study

2025· article· en· W4406392927 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Paul Emery, R. Fleischmann, Robert Wong, Karissa Lozenski, Yoshiya Tanaka, Vivian P. Bykerk, Clifton Bingham, T. Huizinga, Gustavo Citera, Vidya Perera, Bindu Murthy, Kelly Fellows Maxwell, Julie Passarell, William D. Hedrich, Daphne Williams

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAblynxSanofiPfizerEli Lilly and CompanyBristol-Myers Squibb
KeywordsMedicineAbataceptRheumatoid arthritisPost-hoc analysisPost hocInternal medicineArthritisImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether higher serum exposure during subcutaneous (SC) abatacept (ABA) treatment was associated with an increased infection risk in adult patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Data from Assessing Very Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment-2 (AVERT2; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02504268), a randomized, placebo-controlled study in anticitrullinated protein antibody-positive patients with early RA, were analyzed. A post hoc population pharmacokinetic (PPK) analysis was performed. The association between steady-state ABA concentration exposures (ie, steady-state time-averaged serum concentration, steady-state trough serum concentration, steady-state maximum serum concentration) and first infection was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier plots of probability vs time receiving treatment and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: The PK model of SC ABA was defined as a linear 2-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination, and higher body weight was the only covariate with a clinically relevant effect in the final PPK model. Infections occurred in 330/693 patients treated with ABA + methotrexate (MTX; 47.6%; 11/693 [1.6%] with serious infections) and 134/301 of those treated with ABA placebo + MTX (44.5%; 4/301 [1.3%] with serious infections). Exposure-response analysis demonstrated no exposure relationship for an increased risk of first infection for patients with concomitant use of MTX and glucocorticoids (GCs) during the induction period, baseline GC use, or higher-than-median body weight (> 70 kg) at baseline. CONCLUSION: This exposure-response analysis of AVERT-2 showed no increase in the risk of first infection, regardless of ABA exposure level, in patients with RA treated with SC ABA. Similarly, no effect on the risk of first infection was found for concomitant MTX and GC use in patients with RA treated with SC ABA + MTX.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Rheumatology→Same topicRheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies→French-language works237,207→