Evaluating continental channel-hosted <i>Lockeia</i> orientation as a paleoflow indicator: insights from the Jurassic Brushy Basin Member, Western United States
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although bivalves can orient infaunal body position to current direction, trace fossils of bivalves have rarely been corroborated against paleocurrent directions determined from physical sedimentary structures. This study compares Lockeia (bivalve-generated trace fossil) orientation and length to the three-dimensional bedform cross-strata dip direction from fluvial deposits at two localities in the Late Jurassic Brushy Basin Member (Morrison Formation) of the western United States. Lockeia mean orientation at each site are comparable, but tangential, to physical sedimentary structure mean orientations. Comparing accuracy (within one standard deviation) and precision (within two standard deviations) in-context of five macroform surfaces, the Lockeia measurements are more accurate indicators of current direction than the physical sedimentary structures. Conversely, the physical sedimentary structures are more precise than the Lockeia measurements. This dissimilarity is partly a function of the variability of cross-stratum dip orientation produced by three-dimensional bedforms resultant from the tangential nature of the bedform, its preservation, and the method by which these are measured. Lockeia has greater paleocurrent representation accuracy than physical sedimentary structures since it is a linear measurement rather than a collection of measurements that can be tangential to paleoflow. Lockeia measurements show shifts vertically and laterally with macroform changes indicating potential use for identifying local changes in paleocurrent direction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".