MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406412140 · doi:10.1016/j.ncrna.2025.01.005

Circulating PIWI-interacting RNAs in Acute Ischemic Stroke patients

2025· article· en· W4406412140 on OpenAlex
Salman M. Toor, Eman Al‐Dous, Aijaz Parray, Naveed Akhtar, Yasser Al‐Sarraj, Abdelilah Arredouani, Ghulam Jeelani Pir, Sajitha V. Pananchikkal, Omar M. A. El‐Agnaf, Ashfaq Shuaib, Nehad M. Alajez, Omar Albagha

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNon-coding RNA Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicroRNA in disease regulation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Manitoba
FundersQatar Biomedical Research Institute, Hamad Bin Khalifa UniversityHamad Bin Khalifa UniversityKhalifa University of Science, Technology and ResearchHamad Medical CorporationQatar Foundation
KeywordsPiwi-interacting RNAMedicineIschemic strokeInternal medicineCardiologyBioinformaticsBiologyGeneticsIschemiaRNAGeneRNA interference

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Stroke refers to an abrupt neurological deficit, caused by an acute focal injury of the central nervous system via infarction or hemorrhage due to impaired vascularity, and remains among the leading causes of disability and death worldwide. Stroke is often preceded by an episode of neuronal deficit termed transient ischemic attack (TIA), which presents an effective opportunity for mitigating the risk of an eminent acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Circulating non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) have emerged as important biomarkers for stroke, but PIWI-interacting RNAs (piRNAs), a class of small regulatory ncRNAs, have not been previously explored as diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers for stroke. Methods: We conducted comprehensive circulating piRNA profiling of AIS and TIA patients using RNA-seq on serum samples collected within 24 h of clinical diagnosis. The study cohort was divided into discovery and cross-validation datasets to identify replicated piRNAs using stringent analysis cut-offs. The expression levels of the panel of differentially regulated piRNAs between AIS and TIA patients were also compared with healthy controls. Results: We identified a panel of 10 differentially regulated piRNAs between AIS and TIA patients; hsa-piR-28272, -piR-32972, -piR-28247, -piR-24553, -piR-24552, -piR-28275, -piR-28707 and -piR-32882 were upregulated, while hsa-piR-23058 and -piR-23136 were downregulated in AIS patients. Moreover, these 10 piRNAs were also differentially expressed in AIS patients compared to healthy controls. In addition, we investigated the potential gene targets of the dysregulated piRNAs and their plausible involvement in pathophysiological processes affected in stroke. Conclusions: The imbalances in the circulating piRnome of AIS and TIA patients presented herein provide important insights into the roles of piRNAs following ischemic brain injury and potentially provide opportunities to mitigate stroke-induced mortality and morbidity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.651

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it