Underwater DVL Optimization Network (UDON): A Learning-Based DVL Velocity Optimizing Method for Underwater Navigation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As the exploration of marine resources continues to deepen, the utilization of Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs) for conducting marine resource surveys and underwater environmental mapping has become a common practice. In order to successfully accomplish exploration missions, AUVs require high-precision underwater navigation information as support. A Strapdown Inertial Navigation System (SINS) can provide AUVs with accurate attitude and heading information, while a Doppler Velocity Log (DVL) is capable of measuring the velocity vector of the AUVs. Therefore, the integrated SINS/DVL navigation system can furnish the necessary navigational information required by an AUV. In response to the issue of DVL being susceptible to external environmental interference, leading to reduced measurement accuracy, this paper proposes an end-to-end deep-learning approach to enhance the accuracy of DVL velocity vector measurements. The utilization of the raw measurement data from an Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU), which includes gyroscopes and accelerometers, to assist the DVL in velocity vector estimation and to refine it towards the Global Positioning System (GPS) velocity vector, compensates for the external environmental interference affecting the DVL, therefore enhancing the navigation accuracy. To evaluate the proposed method, we conducted lake experiments using SINS and DVL equipment, from which the collected data were organized into a dataset for training and assessing the model. The research results show that the DVL vector predicted by our model can achieve a maximum improvement of 69.26% in terms of root mean square error and a maximum improvement of 78.62% in terms of relative trajectory error.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".