<i>PRKN</i>-Gene-Related Parkinsonism: An Experience from a Tertiary Centre and Literature Review of Asian Cohort
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Background: PRKN-related parkinsonism represents one of the most common types of genetically determined Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, the literature among the Asian ethnicity, particularly in the Indian context, is limited. Objective: To study the clinico-genetic profile of patients with PRKN-related parkinsonism and to review the previously reported cases of PRKN-related parkinsonism from Asia. Methods: A retrospective chart review from a tertiary neurology centre of patients with genetically confirmed PRKN-related parkinsonism. Additionally, we consolidated the Asian cohort from a detailed systematic review of the literature. We utilised the Movement Disorders Society gene cohort for comparison with the world literature. Results: We recruited 16 cases (males = 10, Early onset Parkinson disease (21 to <50 years age at onset)) of PRKN-related parkinsonism with a median age at onset of 28.5 years (range 14–46). Symptoms included parkinsonism (n = 15), dystonia (n = 10), postural instability (n = 7), freezing of gait (n = 5) and non-motor symptoms (NMS) (n = 10). The commonest symptom at onset was tremors (n = 10). Levodopa responsiveness was observed in all cases with drug-induced dyskinesia in eight (50%). Thirteen cases were homozygous, while three were compound heterozygotes, resulting in 19 variants (novel = 5). Exon deletion was the most common (n = 12). The extended Asian cohort comprising 294 cases had a high prevalence of EOPD (n = 186/257, 72.4%) and familial cases (n = 166/252, 65.9%). Deletion/duplication was the common mutation detected (n = 215, 73.1%). The presumed familial cases had a significantly higher frequency of rest tremors, bradykinesia, postural instability, NMS, dyskinesia and sleep disorders. Conclusion: This largest single-centre study from India adds 16 new cases and five novel variants to PRKN literature. In addition, it consolidates the Asian cohort of PRKN elucidating its unique attributes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".