Sleep and breathing in children with Joubert syndrome and a review of other rare congenital hindbrain malformations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Joubert syndrome (JS) is an autosomal recessive disorder with a distinctive mid-hindbrain malformation known as the "molar tooth sign" which involves the breathing control center and its connections with other structures. Literature has reported significant respiratory abnormalities which included hyperpnea interspersed with apneic episodes during wakefulness. Larger-scale studies looking at polysomnographic findings or subjective reports of sleep problems in this population have not yet been published. OBJECTIVES: The primary objectives were (1) compare a large group of children with JS and their unaffected siblings for caregiver-reported sleep difficulties. Secondary objectives were (1) present new polysomnography (PSG) data on our JS cohort; (2) review sleep disordered breathing (SDB) in other rare congenital hindbrain anatomic abnormalities. DESIGN: We conducted a cross-sectional study on a cohort of 109 families affected by JS. METHODS: Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ) and the Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ) along with general medical health information focused on respiratory and sleep problems were mailed to all patients and families. Caregivers were asked to complete the survey for both children with JS and unaffected siblings, if any. Baseline diagnostic PSG was retrospectively reviewed for those with available studies, and the sleep parameters were compared to a referent cohort. RESULTS: < 0.001). PSG data showed severe SDB with apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) of 23 ± 15 events/h in patients with JS. Events were primarily obstructive (obstructive AHI 18 ± 15 events/h vs central AHI 4 ± 4 events/h). Abnormal sleep architecture with increased arousal indices, decreased efficiency, and more time awake and in light sleep or wakefulness when compared to the referent data. CONCLUSION: SDB is common and severe in patients with JS, and the significantly greater obstructive component reported in this cohort makes it necessary to perform complete PSG studies to address or prevent clinical manifestations in this at-risk population. PSQ could represent a viable method to screen for SDB in JS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".