MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406446401 · doi:10.30802/aalas-jaalas-24-127

Evaluating Three Injection Sites for Sedation/Anesthesia Using Ketamine-Xylazine in C57BL/6 Mice (Mus musculus): Intraperitoneal, Subcutaneous Interscapular, and Subcutaneous GV20 Acupuncture Sites

2025· article· en· W4406446401 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Z Teng, Vanessa Oliver, Emily Q Zhang, Daniel Pang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAnesthesia and Sedative Agents
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsXylazineKetamineAnesthesiaMedicineSedationSubcutaneous injectionIntraperitoneal injectionAcupuncturePharmacologyInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mice are commonly anesthetized (or sedated) with drugs injected via the intraperitoneal or subcutaneous interscapular routes. The Governing Vessel 20 (GV20) site, located at the top of the head, is an alternative subcutaneous injection route, shown to be successful in dogs and cats. In a multicenter, randomized, blinded study design, C57BL/6 mice ( n = 66: 60 males, 6 females) were assigned to injection with ketamine (60 mg/kg) and xylazine (5 mg/kg). Injection distributions were as follows: site 1, GV20 ( n = 10) and intraperitoneal ( n = 9); site 2, GV20 ( n = 16), interscapular subcutaneous ( n = 15), and intraperitoneal ( n = 16). Outcome measures were times to ataxia, sternal recumbency, and the loss of righting reflex. Data from sites 1 and 2 were pooled following confirmation that there were no significant differences (Mann–Whitney test). Outcome measures were compared between injection routes with a Kruskal–Wallis test followed by a Dunn multiple comparisons test. Results are reported as median (range) times. Intraperitoneal injection was faster acting than the other injection routes, and there were no significant differences between the GV20 and interscapular subcutaneous routes: ataxia (GV20, 187.0 s [120 to 272]; subcutaneous, 165.0 s [120 to 372]; intraperitoneal, 88.5 s [58 to 171]), sternal recumbency (GV20, 305.5 s [153 to 400], subcutaneous, 305.0 s [249 to 384]; intraperitoneal, 184.5 s [120 to 397]), loss of righting reflex (GV20, 399.0 s [208 to 589]; subcutaneous, 347.0 s [249 to 468]; intraperitoneal, 190.0 s [142 to 402]). In summary, the GV20 subcutaneous injection route does not appear to have benefits compared with the intraperitoneal route and is not superior to the interscapular subcutaneous injection route in C57BL/6 mice when evaluated using a combination of ketamine and xylazine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal ScienceSame topicAnesthesia and Sedative AgentsFrench-language works237,207