MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406475777 · doi:10.1186/s12978-024-01918-7

Practice and factors associated with sunlight exposure of infants among mothers in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2025· review· en· W4406475777 on OpenAlex
Shambel Dessale Asmamaw, Tibebu Habte Zewde, Esayas Nigussie

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueReproductive Health · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVitamin D Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReproductive medicineSunlightMeta-analysisPublic healthSun exposureMedicineEnvironmental healthBiostatisticsPregnancyDemographyPediatricsBiologyInternal medicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Exposure to sunlight aids in the body's production of vitamin D, guards against rickets, and treats newborn jaundice. In Ethiopia, the magnitude of sunlight exposure practice varies across studies. Thus, this study aimed to estimate the pooled practices and factors associated with sunlight exposure of infants among mothers in Ethiopia. METHODS: Electronic search was carried out using databases (PubMed, HINARI, Science Direct, electronic databases, and Google Scholar) for relevant articles published from January 1, 2010, to March 27, 2024. The screening process was carried out in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Articles conducted in English and quantitatively expressed were considered in this review. The quality assessment of included articles was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data analysis was carried out using STATA-14 version software. I2 statistics and Egger's test were used to evaluate heterogeneity and publication bias, respectively. The pooled prevalence with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of the meta-analysis utilizing the random effect model was displayed using forest plots, and adjusted odds ratio (AOR) was utilized to quantify the association. RESULTS: 1171 records, 13 studies were included in the meta-analysis with 5190 study participants that fulfill the inclusion criteria, and all the included studies were cross-sectional in design. The pooled prevalence of sunlight exposure practice among mothers in Ethiopia was 45.38% CI (38.36, 52.4). Good sunlight-related knowledge (AOR; 1.61, 95% CI 1.3, 1.98), maternal formal education (AOR; 1.35, 95% CI 1.08, 1.69), housewife (AOR; 0.7, 95% CI 0.51, 0.95), and husband formal education (AOR; 1.29, 95% CI 1.07, 1.56) were significantly associated with good sunlight exposure practice. CONCLUSION: The pooled prevalence of good sunlight exposure practice among mothers in Ethiopia was low. Good sunlight-related knowledge, being a housewife, and maternal and husband formal education were the factors that were associated with good sunlight exposure practice. Thus, the government needs to cater further assistance and initiate greater information circulation and follow-up to improve the situation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.029
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.563
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.029
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0150.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.118
GPT teacher head0.439
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it