MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406480905 · doi:10.31949/jsa.v3i2.11671

FACTORS AFFECTING THE DEVELOPMENT OF FOREST TOURISM CEMARA BEACH AND ITS IMPACT ON INCOME FARMER HOUSEHOLD

2024· article· en· W4406480905 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sustainable Agribusiness · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicStrategic Planning and Analysis
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTourismHousehold incomeBusinessSocioeconomicsGeographyAgricultural economicsEnvironmental planningEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this study is to examine the factors that impact the growth of Cemara Beach Forest Tourism and its effect on the earnings of farmer households. The respondents were selected through the census method, with a total of 65 units. The approach employed for analysis was path analysis and paired t test. The study revealed that the attractiveness and tourism environment of Cemara beach forest, which includes Attractions, Amenities, Accessibility, and Auxiliary Services, had a good achievement level of 72.90%. Supporting Institutions for tourism also achieved a good criterion of 65.85%. Additionally, community participation showed good conditions with a good criteria achievement level of 61.92%. The development of Cemara Beach Forest Tourism attained a good criteria achievement level of 77.93%. Tourist Attraction and Environment had a positive correlation r = 0.89, indicating a very close relationship with Supporting Institutions. This suggests that the better the Supporting Institutions are, the better the Tourist Attraction and Environment. Community Participation demonstrated an indication of a very close relationship with Tourist Attraction and Environment. This implies that community participation increases with better tourist attractions and the environment. Supporting Institutions had a positive correlation r = 0.89 with community participation, indicating a close relationship. This implies that the better the Supporting Institutions, the better the community participation. Tourist Attraction and Environment, Supporting Institutions, and Community Participation had a positive effect on the development of Cemara beach forest tourism, with tourist attraction having the greatest influence at 46.85%, followed by Supporting Institutions at 25.82%, and Community Participation at 23.58%. The development of Cemara coastal forest tourism had a positive impact on the income of farmer households, increasing it by an average of 67.16%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.167
Threshold uncertainty score0.501

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it