MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406494712 · doi:10.18260/1-2-1153-49660

USING CLOUD COMPUTING TO UNITE OUR UNIVERSITY

2025· article· en· W4406494712 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Aniqa Azam

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCloud Computing and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCloud computingComputer scienceOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

DeVry University has expanded over the years with five distinct colleges, more than ninety locations in the US, Canada, and Brazil.DeVry offers traditional faceto-face courses in the classroom, online courses and hybrid or blended courses, and uses technology to enhance the curriculum.The expansion presumably increased the number of students as well as DeVry faculty and staff.Each student, instructor, manager, and staff member is different, yet each is striving towards the same goal: success.It is important to create a unique learning environment regardless of the culture or language.Technology plays a key role in this objective, and with the advancements in technology, it is important for our university to aim to use the newest and most efficient technology in order to encourage collaboration between learners, instructors and others in the academic community.Being more efficient is important, but being cost effective is equally important.Cloud computing is a technology that can be used to streamline the learning process and infrastructure, making it easier for students, teachers and administrators to strive towards academic success.It is the technical means by which everything can be delivered as a service over the internet, accessible from any device, any place, anytime.By providing access to education and the academic community anytime and anywhere, DeVry can emerge as a leader in the academic world.DeVry is made up of many voices but is one university, and cloud computing could be the tool used to unite our vision, objectives, and values for many different audiences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.002
Scholarly communication0.0110.009
Open science0.0020.014
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCloud Computing and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207