Identity-related problems: direct and indirect associations with emotional intelligence and childhood environment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: Identity-related problems are associated with various negative outcomes including depression and self-inflicted injury. Researchers theorise that childhood invalidating environments may contribute to identity problems, whereas high parental emotional availability facilitates adaptive identity functioning. We investigated the association between these developmental environments and identity functioning using a cross-sectional design, and the potential intermediary role of emotional intelligence. Method: = 1.64; 77% female; 53.2% Asian; 38.2% White) completed online questionnaires assessing emotional intelligence, childhood invalidation, parental emotional availability, and identity functioning. We used PROCESS Macro with bootstrapped samples to examine the direct and indirect associations (via emotional intelligence) between developmental environments (i.e. childhood invalidation and parental emotional availability) and identity functioning (global identity problems, disturbed identity, lack of identity, and consolidated identity). Results: Childhood invalidating environments and parental emotional availability were each directly and indirectly (via emotional intelligence) associated with identity problems. Higher childhood invalidating environment scores were associated with poorer emotional intelligence, which in turn were associated with more severe identity problems and lower consolidated identity scores. Conversely, higher parental emotional availability scores were associated with higher emotional intelligence scores, which in turn were associated with higher consolidated identity scores and lower identity problems. Discussion: Distinct aspects of identity-related functioning were implicated in these pathways, underscoring the importance of conceptualising identity functioning as a multifaceted construct. Our findings provide preliminary support for the role of emotional intelligence and developmental environments as important correlates of and potential contributors to identity problems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".