MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406496739 · doi:10.1080/07352166.2024.2445837

Ex nihilo urbanization in Nigeria: Colonial legacies, privatization, and foreign actors

2025· article· en· W4406496739 on OpenAlex
Favour Daka, Sarah Moser

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Urban Affairs · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban and Rural Development Challenges
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsUrbanizationColonialismPolitical scienceDevelopment economicsPolitical economySociologyEconomicsEconomic growthLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the past 2 decades, Nigeria has become a hotspot for the creation of new cities, with a dozen currently underway. While new cities in Nigeria are promoted by their developers as necessary for addressing the urban challenges plaguing cities, including overcrowding, housing deficits, a lack of amenities, and poor transportation infrastructure, we suggest that new cities in Nigeria are products of neoliberal urban policies and that they prioritize luxury and exclusivity. The current new city boom in Nigeria tracks with the global proliferation of projects of similar scale and ambition, but our research highlights that building ex nihilo new cities has a long history in Nigeria dating back to British colonialism. This paper identifies 39 ex nihilo urban mega-developments carried out in Nigeria since the British colonial era and examines their strategic locations and rationales, the key actors involved, and the urban practices guiding their creation in three distinct eras—colonial, post-independence, and contemporary—in order to understand the continuities and differences in new city development over time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.462
Threshold uncertainty score0.363

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it