MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406521806 · doi:10.1093/cid/ciaf021

Concordance of Noninvasive Plasma Cell-free DNA With Invasive Diagnostics for Diagnosis of Invasive Fungal Disease

2025· article· en· W4406521806 on OpenAlexaff
Anthony Lieu, Alex Zimmet, Joseph Pozdol, Lauren E. Kushner, Dora Y. Ho, Niaz Banaei

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Infectious Diseases · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineConcordanceCell-free fetal DNADiseasePlasma cellDNAPathologyComputational biologyInternal medicineGeneticsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Mold plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a promising noninvasive diagnostic modality for early diagnosis of invasive mold disease (IMD) in immunocompromised patients. Although mold cfDNA PCR has been shown to be highly accurate, the value of invasive procedures to collect specimens for conventional fungal diagnostics following plasma cfDNA testing remains unclear. METHODS: This retrospective single-center cohort study included patients with mold plasma cfDNA PCR performed 7 days before or 2 days after invasive specimen collection. Mold PCR detected Aspergillus species, Mucorales agents, Fusarium species, and Scedosporium species. Invasive procedures included tissue biopsy and bronchoscopy. The primary endpoint was the concordance of mold plasma cfDNA PCR results with results of conventional fungal tests performed on tissue and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. RESULTS: Five hundred and six patients with mold plasma cfDNA PCR resulting ahead of invasive specimen (123 tissue and 426 bronchoalveolar lavage fluid) results were included, and 437 (86.4%) were immunocompromised. After adjudicating discordant results based on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium definitions for IMD, mold plasma cfDNA PCR and invasive test results were 88.5% (448/506) concordant. In proven cases, 64.7% (11/17) of negative mold plasma cfDNA PCR results occurred in patients with fungal sinusitis (8) and limb infection (3). Nonhematologic malignancy and nonneutropenic state were statistically associated with negative mold plasma cfDNA PCR in patients with proven or probable IMD. CONCLUSIONS: Noninvasive mold plasma cfDNA PCR results were highly concordant with invasive specimen fungal test results, indicating risk-prone invasive specimen collection can be safely curtailed in immunocompromised patients with suspected IMD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Infectious DiseasesSame topicCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207