Significant oligodendrocyte progenitor and microglial cell death is a feature of remyelination following toxin-induced experimental demyelination
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The extent to which glial cell turnover features in successful remyelination is unclear. In this study, the rat caudal cerebellar peduncle-ethidium bromide lesion model was used to profile oligodendroglial and microglial/macrophage cell death and proliferation dynamics over the course of repair. Lesioned and control tissue was co-labelled with antibody markers for cell identity, proliferation, and apoptosis (TUNEL assay), then imaged at full thickness using confocal microscopy and quantified using custom CellProfiler pipelines. Early remyelination time points were marked by an increased density of total proliferating cells, including oligodendrocyte progenitor cells. Late remyelination time points featured increased TUNEL+ oligodendrocyte progenitor cells: however, most TUNEL+ cells within remyelinating lesions were Iba1+ microglia/macrophages. These results indicate that repairing lesions are characterized by a high degree of glial cell death and suggest that monitoring cell death-related by-products might have clinical value in the setting of remyelination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".