MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406548900 · doi:10.1139/cjfr-2025-0008

Biocontrol of the pine processionary moth, <i>Thaumetopoea wilkinsoni</i> (Tams.) (Lepidoptera: Notodontidae) by forest-derived entomopathogenic fungi

2025· article· en· W4406548900 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Muhammed Koç, Duygu Bekircan Eski, Ardahan Eski

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Forest Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicEntomological Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLepidoptera genitaliaBiological pest controlBiologyForestryBotanyEcologyHorticultureGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The pine processionary moth (PPM), Thaumetopoea wilkinsoni Tams. (Lepidoptera: Notodontidae), is an important forest pest in the Mediterranean region. This study demonstrated for the first time the biocontrol potential of entomopathogenic fungi (EPF) isolated from pine forest soils on Thaumetopoea wilkinsoni. The identity of five isolates obtained by the Tenebrio-bait method was established by macroscopic and microscopic features and ITS-rDNA sequencing. Pathogenicity and virulence of novel indigenous isolates on fourth stage larvae of Thaumetopoea wilkinsoni were then determined. PPM1, PPM3, and PPM5 were identified as Beauveria bassiana Vuill. (Hypocreales: Cordycipitaceae); PPM2 and PPM4 were identified as Fusarium oxysporum Schlecht. (Hypocreales: Nectriaceae). All isolates were found to be pathogenic at a concentration of 10 7 conidia/mL, with virulence varying between 15% and 100%. The pathogenicity of Fusarium oxysporum on Thaumetopoea wilkinsoni was demonstrated for the first time in this study and its virulence was determined to be 76%. In addition, the virulence of Beauveria bassiana PPM1 isolate reached 100% at a concentration of 10 7 conidia/mL 14 days after treatment. Moreover, the median lethal concentration (LC 50 ) required to kill 50% of the larval population was estimated to be 5.7 × 10 3 conidia/mL. Our results are important to improve the application of new EPF species as biological control agents in pest management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.151
Threshold uncertainty score0.931

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Forest ResearchSame topicEntomological Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207