MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406555839 · doi:10.1111/epi.18277

Association of social determinants of health with first antiseizure medication prescription for patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

2025· review· en· W4406555839 on OpenAlexaffabout
Brian Johnson, Megan MacKenzie, Nathalie Jetté, Nihal Mohamed, Leah J. Blank

Bibliographic record

VenueEpilepsia · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Institute on Aging
KeywordsMedical prescriptionEpilepsyMeta-analysisAssociation (psychology)MedicinePsychiatryPediatricsPsychologyInternal medicinePsychotherapistPharmacology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether social determinants of health (SDOHs) are associated with the first antiseizure medication (ASM) prescribed for newly diagnosed epilepsy. METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards were followed, and the protocol registered (CRD42023448998). Embase, Medline, and Web of Science were searched up to July 31, 2023. Two reviewers independently screened studies and reached mutual consensus for inclusion. Studies reporting the first ASM prescribed for patients with new epilepsy in all age groups, countries, and languages were eligible for inclusion. Review articles, conference abstracts, and studies with fewer than 15 participants were not eligible for inclusion. Studies were meta-analyzed using fixed-effects models. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: Thirteen studies (total participants = 380,785) contained SDOH data and their association with the first ASM prescription after epilepsy diagnosis. Meta-analysis of studies with compatible data revealed that Black (pooled odds ratio [OR] .94, 95% confidence interval [CI] .90-.98) and Hispanic (pooled OR .89, 95% CI .82-.97) patients with U.S. Medicare/Medicaid had a lower odds of receiving a newer ASM compared to White patients. Three studies revealed that rural epilepsy patients had a lower odds of receiving new ASMs compared to urban patients (pooled OR .84, 95% CI .80-.89). The relationship between income levels and ASM prescription patterns differed across countries, highlighting inconsistencies that warrant further investigation. Among studies identified for inclusion, relatively few had combinable data, thereby limiting the scope of our meta-analysis to two SDOHs. SIGNIFICANCE: Significant disparities exist in first-line ASM prescription for non-White and rural persons with epilepsy. There exist few data on other SDOHs including gender identity and socioeconomic background. Future work leveraging large data sets may reveal additional ASM prescription inequities. Developing care pathways to rectify known prescribing disparities may improve health equity among PWE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.035
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.078

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.035
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0170.046
Bibliometrics0.0070.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEpilepsiaSame topicEpilepsy research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207