The hypertrophic cardiomyopathy-associated A331P actin variant enhances basal contractile activity and elicits resting muscle dysfunction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previous studies aimed at defining the mechanistic basis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy caused by A331P cardiac actin have reported conflicting results. The mutation is located along an actin surface strand, proximal to residues that interact with tropomyosin. These F-actin-tropomyosin associations are vital for proper contractile inhibition. To help resolve disease pathogenesis, we implemented a multidisciplinary approach. Transgenic Drosophila , expressing A331P actin, displayed skeletal muscle hypercontraction and elevated basal myocardial activity. A331P thin filaments, reconstituted using recombinant human cardiac actin, exhibited higher in vitro myosin-based sliding speeds, exclusively at low Ca 2+ concentrations. Cryo-EM-based reconstructions revealed no detectable A331P-related structural perturbations in F-actin. In silico , however, the P331-containing actin surface strand was less mobile and established diminished van der Waal's attractive forces with tropomyosin, which correlated with greater variability in inhibitory tropomyosin positioning. Such mutation-induced effects potentially elevate resting contractile activity among our models and may stimulate pathology in patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".