Ontogeny of skeletogenesis in yellow perch and effects of early thermal environment on bone development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Environmental temperature has a major impact on ontogeny of early development in teleost fish because of differential effects on rates of growth, cellular differentiation, and metabolism. Environmental temperature can thus lead to changes in relative rates of the development of physiological and anatomical components of the body including bone formation. Changes in ontogeny or rate of skeletogenesis can lead to variations in morphological or physiological phenotypes and may affect the relationship of form and function for foraging and predator avoidance. This study examined the normal ontogeny of skeleton in yellow perch, assessing development of the axial skeleton, the cranio-facial region, and the fins, in yellow perch larvae and pre-juveniles. The ontogeny of skeletogenesis in yellow perch was comparable to other related species. Fish were also reared at constant temperatures of 12, 15, or 18 °C to examine the influence of developmental temperature; post-hatch fish were moved to a common 18 °C. Warm incubation temperatures (15 and 18 °C) increased the extent of ossification for some bones in all body regions, particularly in the exogenous feeding, and the pre-juvenile fish (30 and 40 days post hatch). This was evident in both the extent of ossification and counts of meristic characters of ossified bones. Significantly lower ossification and meristic counts in 40 dph fish reared at 12 °C may limit jaw functionality and suggests an undeveloped vertebral column and fins. Future studies should investigate swim performance and foraging to determine if delayed bone development has potential fitness costs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".