MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406609175 · doi:10.1186/s12877-025-05684-4

A mobile-based multidomain lifestyle intervention using Cognitive Evergreenland for older adults with subjective cognitive decline: a feasibility study

2025· article· en· W4406609175 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rong Lin, Yuanjiao Yan, Zhili Chen, Chenshan Huang, Junyu Zhao, Mingfeng Chen, Hong Li

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Geriatrics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMedicineCognitionCognitive declineGerontologyIntervention (counseling)RehabilitationCognitive rehabilitation therapyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationCognitive agingPhysical therapyDementiaPsychiatryDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Dementia is a growing public health issue. Non-drug interventions targeting individuals before the onset of overt cognitive decline may be effective. Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is present in > 50% of older adults and associated with progression to dementia. Here, we tested the compliance and effectiveness of a Multidomain Lifestyle Intervention Program using the mini-program, Cognitive Evergreenland, (MLIP-CE), based on the Health Action Process Approach model to support home-based intervention in older adults with SCD. METHODS: Cognitive Evergreenland was designed to improve cognitive reserve and maintain brain function in people at high risk of dementia and included: cognitive stimulation, cognitive training, health education, vascular risk monitoring, social support, and functional assessment, among other features. This was an exploratory trial designed to examine participant compliance with the mobile lifestyle intervention and its effectiveness, as well as changes in health-related indicators and cognitive function of older adults with SCD from baseline to 12 and 24 weeks post-intervention. RESULTS: The retention rate for MLIP-CE was 90.2% (37/41). Mean participant age was 70.93 ± 6.91 years, 73.2% of participants were female, and mean Montreal Cognitive Assessment score was 24.51 ± 2.87. Throughout the 24 weeks of the prescribed intervention, app usage remained consistently high, with over 92% of participants using the mini-program at least once a week and successfully completing corresponding health management tasks. In terms of average usage, cognitive training emerged as the most frequently used functional module (95.73%), closely followed by health education (95.02%). The health behavior levels of older adults with SCD, measured in terms of ability, opportunity, and motivation, were significantly increased relative to baseline (p < 0.001). Regarding cognitive function, Mini-Mental State Examination scores were significantly improved post-intervention, with a moderate effect size (Hedges' g = 0.60). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that MLIP-CE, which was designed based on a theoretical framework, has potential for implementation, and support ongoing research into use of MLIP-CE for individuals at high risk of SCD or other dementia conditions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was prospectively registered at the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry with the registration number ChiCTR2200058665 on 13 April 2022.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: Non-randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC GeriatricsSame topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFrench-language works237,207