MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406628714 · doi:10.7759/cureus.77694

Modulation of Glutamatergic Burst Activity by Hydrolysed Arabinoxylan Rice Bran: A Multielectrode Array Study in Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Neurones and Astrocytes

2025· article· en· W4406628714 on OpenAlexaff
Basant K. Puri, Cecilia Catuogno-Cal, Ivan Verduci

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedicinal Plants and Neuroprotection
Canadian institutionsAdvanced Electrophoresis Solutions (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlutamatergicInduced pluripotent stem cellNeuroscienceGABAergicPremovement neuronal activityCell biologyBiologyGlutamate receptorBiochemistryReceptorInhibitory postsynaptic potential

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The natural product MGN-3 (Biobran) is a defatted, partially hydrolysed rice bran-derived hemicellulose enzymatically modified with an extract of Lentinus edodes. It has a high proportion of arabinoxylan. It has a protective action against intracerebroventricular streptozotocin-induced murine sporadic Alzheimer’s disease and reverses spatial memory deficit in this disease model. The aim was to test the hypothesis that MGN-3 increases glutamatergic burst activity in human neuronal and glial cells by conducting an in vitro multielectrode array-based micro-electrophysiological study in a cultured mixture of human glutamatergic neurones, GABAergic neurones and astrocytes. The effects of MGN-3 at two concentrations, 0.750 g L-1 and 0.375 g L-1, and vehicle (control), on glutamatergic burst activity in a triculture of human-induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived GABAergic neurones, glutamatergic neurones and astrocytes were studied. The change in the number of glutamatergic bursts normalised to the vehicle control was analysed using a normal or Gaussian generalised linear model. This statistical model was highly significant (p = 1.468 × 10-17). Both MGN-3 concentrations were associated with highly significant main effects. These results provide strong evidence to reject the null hypothesis that MGN-3 does not affect glutamatergic burst activity in human neuronal and astrocytic cells. The study's strengths include the novel use of hiPSC-derived neurones and astrocytes and the robust statistical significance of the findings. Limitations include in vitro conditions that may not fully replicate in vivo conditions, potential variability in hiPSC-derived cell preparations, and the need to test other neuronal subtypes or additional doses to assess dose-dependent effects. These should be addressed in future studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.275
Threshold uncertainty score0.621

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureusSame topicMedicinal Plants and NeuroprotectionFrench-language works237,207