MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406629095 · doi:10.1080/13854046.2025.2451828

Single- versus two-test criteria for cognitive impairment: associations with CSF and imaging markers in former American football players

2025· article· en· W4406629095 on OpenAlexaff
Monica T. Ly, Caroline Altaras, Yorghos Tripodis, Charles H. Adler, Laura J. Balcer, Charles Bernick, Henrik Zetterberg, Kaj Blennow, Elaine R. Peskind, Sarah J. Banks, William Barr, Jennifer V. Wethe, Steve Lenio, Mark W. Bondi, Lisa Delano‐Wood, Robert C. Cantu, Michael Coleman, David W. Dodick, Jesse Mez, Daniel H. Daneshvar, Joseph Palmisano, Brett Martin, Alexander Lin, Inga K. Koerte, Sylvain Bouix, Jeffrey L. Cummings, Eric M. Reiman, Martha E. Shenton, Robert Stern, Michael L. Alosco

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Clinical Neuropsychologist · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Institute on AgingNational Institutes of HealthOlav Thon StiftelsenVetenskapsrådetFamiljen Erling-Perssons StiftelseNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institute of General Medical SciencesAlzheimer's Association
KeywordsFootballCognitive impairmentAmerican footballTest (biology)PsychologyFootball playersCognitionCollege footballCognitive testMedicineClinical psychologyCognitive psychologyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationNeurosciencePolitical scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: Cognitive impairment is a core feature of traumatic encephalopathy syndrome (TES), the putative clinical syndrome of chronic traumatic encephalopathy—a neuropathological disease associated with repetitive head impacts (RHI). Careful operationalization of cognitive impairment is essential to improving the diagnostic specificity and accuracy of TES criteria. We compared single- versus two-test criteria for cognitive impairment in their associations with CSF and imaging biomarkers in male former American football players. Method: 169 participants from the DIAGNOSE CTE Research Project completed neuropsychological tests of memory and executive functioning. Cognitive impairment was identified by single-test criteria (z≤-1.5 on one test) and two-test criteria (z<-1 on two tests within a domain). ANCOVAs adjusting for age, race, education, body mass index, word-reading score, and APOE ε4 status assessed whether single- or two-test criteria predicted CSF markers (Aβ1-42, p-tau181, p-tau181/Aβ1-42, total tau, neurofilament light [NfL], glial fibrillary acidic protein [GFAP]) and MRI markers (hippocampal volume, cortical thickness, white matter hyperintensities). Results: Ninety-nine participants met single-test criteria for cognitive impairment. Sixty-six met two-test criteria. Participants who met two-test criteria had greater exposure to RHI than those who did not (p=.04). Two-test criteria were ­associated with higher CSF p-tau181/Aβ1-42 (q=.02) and CSF NfL (q=.02). The association between two-test criteria and CSF NfL remained after excluding amyloid-positive participants (q=.04). Single-test criteria were not associated with any biomarkers (q’s>.05). Conclusions: Two-test but not single-test criteria for cognitive impairment were associated with markers of neurodegeneration. Future clinical research in TES may benefit from applying two-test criteria to operationalize cognitive impairment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Clinical NeuropsychologistSame topicFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesFrench-language works237,207