Quality of Life Assessment in Primary Headache Patients with Headaches Related to Abuse Using Scales and Questionnaires
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study, conducted between 2022 and 2024 in Tashkent, Uzbekistan, assessed 100 patients with abuse headaches (AH), split into two groups: those with migraine-induced AH and those with tension-type headache (TTH)-induced AH. Using standardized tools such as the VASH scale, HALT-90 index, LDQ scale, and McGill Pain Questionnaire, the study measured pain intensity, drug dependence, and functional impairment. Results revealed that migraine-induced AH caused more severe pain (VASH: 8.6±1.47) and greater productivity loss (HALT-90: 23.35±14.82) compared to TTH-induced AH. Women, especially of working age, were predominantly affected. Both groups showed moderate drug dependence, with higher levels in TTH patients. These findings highlight the need for integrated pain management strategies to reduce medication overuse and improve patient quality of life. Future research should explore lifestyle and psychosocial factors, with long-term studies needed to evaluate alternative treatment approaches for both migraine- and TTH-induced AH.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it