MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406646264 · doi:10.1038/s43856-024-00712-7

Preclinical assessment of splicing modulation therapy for ABCA4 variant c.768G>T in Stargardt disease

2025· article· en· W4406646264 on OpenAlexaff
Dyah W. Karjosukarso, Femke Bukkems, Lonneke Duijkers, Tomasz Z. Tomkiewicz, Julia F. Kiefmann, Andrei Sarlea, Sander Bervoets, Irene Vázquez-Domínguez, Laurie L. Molday, Robert S. Molday, Mihai G. Netea, Carel B. Hoyng, Alejandro Garanto, Rob W.J. Collin

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRetinal Development and Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersStichting tot Verbetering van het Lot der BlindenStichting BlindenhulpLandelijke Stichting voor Blinden en SlechtziendenStichting Blinden-PenningStichting voor OoglijdersStichting Steunfonds UitzichtRadboud Universitair Medisch CentrumOogfondsAlgemene Nederlandse Vereniging ter voorkoming van BlindheidRetina UKFoundation Fighting Blindness
KeywordsStargardt diseaseABCA4ExonBiologyRNA splicingIn vivoMolecular biologyExon skippingIntronAlternative splicingCell biologyCancer researchRNAGeneticsGenePhenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Stargardt disease type 1 (STGD1) is a progressive retinal disorder caused by bi-allelic variants in the ABCA4 gene. A recurrent variant at the exon-intron junction of exon 6, c.768G>T, causes a 35-nt elongation of exon 6 that leads to premature termination of protein synthesis. METHODS: To correct this aberrant splicing, twenty-five 2'-O-methoxyethyl antisense oligonucleotides (AONs) were designed, spanning the entire exon elongation. RESULTS: Testing of these AONs in patient-derived photoreceptor precursor cells and retinal organoids allow the selection of a lead candidate AON (A7 21-mer) that rescues on average 52% and 50% expression of wild-type ABCA4 transcript and protein, respectively. In situ hybridization and probe-based ELISA demonstrate its distribution and stability in vitro and in vivo. No major safety concerns regarding off-targets, immunostimulation and toxicity are observed in transcriptomics analysis, cytokine stimulation assays in human primary immune cells, and cytotoxicity assays. CONCLUSIONS: Additional optimization and in vivo studies will be performed to further investigate the lead candidate. Considering the high prevalence of this variant, a substantial number of patients are likely to benefit from a successful further development and implementation of this therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.308
Threshold uncertainty score0.262

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.405
Teacher spread0.364 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunications MedicineSame topicRetinal Development and DisordersFrench-language works237,207