Improved Annotation of Asthma Gene Variants with Cell Type Deconvolution of Nasal and Lung Expression Quantitative Trait Loci
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Asthma is a genetically complex inflammatory airway disease associated with more than 200 SNPs. However, the functional effects of many asthma-associated SNPs in lung and airway epithelial samples are unknown. Here, we aimed to conduct expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) analysis using a meta-analysis of nasal and lung samples. We hypothesize that incorporating cell type proportions of airway and lung samples enhances eQTL analysis outcomes. Nasal brush (n = 792) and lung tissue (n = 1,087) samples were investigated separately. Initially, a general eQTL analysis identified genetic variants associated with gene expression levels. Estimated cell type proportions were adjusted based on the Human Lung Cell Atlas. In addition, the presence of significant interaction effects between asthma-associated SNPs and each cell type proportion was explored and considered evidence for cell type–associated eQTL. In nasal brush and lung parenchyma samples, 44 and 116 asthma-associated SNPs were identified as eQTL. Adjusting for cell type proportions revealed eQTL for an additional 17 genes (e.g., FCER1G, CD200R1, and GABBR2) and 16 genes (e.g., CYP2C8, SLC9A2, and SGCD) in nose and lung, respectively. Moreover, we identified eQTL for nine SNPs annotated to genes such as VASP, FOXA3, and PCDHB12 displayed significant interactions with cell type proportions of club, goblet, and alveolar macrophages. Our findings demonstrate increased power for identifying eQTL among asthma-associated SNPs by considering cell type proportion of the bulk RNA-sequencing data from nasal and lung tissues. Integration of cell type deconvolution and eQTL analysis enhances our understanding of asthma genetics and cellular mechanisms, uncovering potential therapeutic targets for personalized interventions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".