MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406672989 · doi:10.1063/5.0248648

Gel plugging simulation with a new model and applications

2025· article· en· W4406672989 on OpenAlexaff
Zhen Qian, Peng Deng, Boyi Qu, Suyang Zhu, Chaojie Di, Xiaolong Peng, Zhangxin Chen

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGranular flow and fluidized beds
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersScience Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of Sichuan ProvinceChina National Funds for Distinguished Young ScientistsNatural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province
KeywordsPhysicsMechanicsStatistical physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Injecting gel plugs into water-flooded wells can significantly reduce the water cut in wells and extend their operational lifespan. However, critical injection parameters, such as volume and speed, are often based on empirical estimates, leading to many wells being completely blocked following gel injection. This study introduces a new numerical gel component model that accurately simulates the gel flow process, enabling precise calculations of the required injection parameters. For this research, the gel compositional model was applied to two wells in the Tahe Oilfield. A detailed comparison between this new model, traditional polymer models, and historical data was conducted. The results show a 39% increase in oil production and a 19% improvement in water production accuracy. Furthermore, the new gel compositional model shows that gel migration distance and sealing volume strongly correlate with the amount of injected water and the karst background. Therefore, precise calculation of water invasion channels is essential before applying the gel plugging technique. This study shows that the success of gel water-shutoff techniques relies heavily on accurately simulating injection parameters, and the new simulation model provides a valuable reference for such technique applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.939
Threshold uncertainty score0.275

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of FluidsSame topicGranular flow and fluidized bedsFrench-language works237,207