MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406682209 · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2025.01.029

A call to action: The need to update population descriptors in dermatology research studies with the use of an inclusive skin classification system

2025· article· en· W4406682209 on OpenAlexaff
Valerie M. Harvey, Stafford G. Brown, Cheryl Burgess, Angel S. Byrd, Caryn Cobb, Seemal R. Desai, Candrice Heath, Tarannum Jaleel, Amy McMichael, Yvette Miller-Monthrope, Hema Sundaram, Junko Takeshita, Susan C. Taylor, Jonathan S. Weiss, Jane Yoo, Valerie Callender

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSex and Gender in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsWomen's College Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDermatologyCall to actionAction (physics)PopulationEnvironmental healthAdvertising

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.505
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.628
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.495
Threshold uncertainty score0.611

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.5050.628
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0130.008
Bibliometrics0.0130.009
Science and technology studies0.0100.028
Scholarly communication0.0300.048
Open science0.0180.016
Research integrity0.0420.079
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.221
GPT teacher head0.484
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
DomainMethods
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Academy of DermatologySame topicSex and Gender in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207