Quantitative evaluation of surface crack depth on notched bars with laser-infrared detection technology
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To achieve non-destructive detection of crack depth in the process of notching and cracking of metal bars in low-stress cropping, a quantitative detection method for crack depth of notched bars based on infrared thermography technology under laser excitation is proposed in this paper. Combined with physical experiments, a simulation model of the temperature distribution of the laser-excited bar is established for efficient data acquisition, and the temperature curves of the bar surface under laser excitation are analysed from the perspective of space and time. On this basis, the study selects the feature parameters of the three types of defects on the surface of the metal bar, namely notch, surface crack and crack of notch bottom. A backpropagation (BP) neural network model is established for crack depth by dividing the crack into two types of a notch with crack and unnotched crack, and compared with other common prediction models. The results show that the selected features can accurately characterise the cracks in this BP neural network model, and the detected error in crack depth assessment is less than 3%. Performance metrics are established to evaluate the model, which has good reliability under different noises.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it