Reinforcement Learning‐Based Unicast and Broadcast Wireless Semantic Communications
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Semantic communication has been deemed as a promising communication paradigm to break through the bottleneck of traditional communications. Nonetheless, most of the existing works focus more on point-to-point communication scenarios and its extension to multiuser scenarios is not that straightforward due to its cost inefficiencies to directly scale the joint source-channel coding framework to the multiuser communication system. Meanwhile, previous methods optimize the system by differentiable bit-level supervision, easily leading to a “semantic gap.” Therefore, we delve into multiuser broadcast communication (BC) based on the universal transformer (UT) and propose a reinforcement learning (RL)-based self-critical alternate learning (SCAL) algorithm, named SemanticBC-SCAL, to capably adapt to the different BC channels from one transmitter (TX) to multiple receivers (RXs) for sentence generation task. Since the unicast scenario is a special case of the broadcast scenario, we have unified these two situations within the broadcast model. In particular, to enable stable optimization via a nondifferentiable semantic metric, we regard sentence similarity as a reward and formulate this learning process as an RL problem. Considering the huge decision space, we adopt a lightweight but efficient self-critical supervision to guide the learning process. Meanwhile, an alternate learning mechanism is developed to provide cost-effective learning, in which the encoder and decoders are updated asynchronously with different iterations. Notably, the incorporation of RL makes SemanticBC-SCAL compliant with any user-defined semantic similarity metric and simultaneously addresses the channel's nondifferentiability issue by alternate learning. Additionally, we also compare the performance in one-to-one scenarios built on the long short-term memory and UT architectures. Extensive simulation results are conducted to verify the effectiveness and superiorness of our approach in both unicast and broadcast scenarios.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it