Feasibility Study of Detecting and Segmenting Small Brain Tumors in a Small MRI Dataset with Self-Supervised Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives: This paper studies the segmentation and detection of small metastatic brain tumors. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of training a deep neural network for the segmentation and detection of metastatic brain tumors in MRI using a very small dataset of 33 cases, by leveraging large public datasets of primary tumors; Methods: This study explores various methods, including supervised learning, two transfer learning approaches, and self-supervised learning, utilizing U-net and Swin UNETR models; Results: The self-supervised learning approach utilizing the Swin UNETR model yielded the best performance. The Dice score for small brain tumors was approximately 0.19. Sensitivity reached 100%, while specificity was 54.5%. When excluding subjects with hyperintensities, the specificity improved to 80.0%; Conclusions: It is feasible to train a model using self-supervised learning and a small dataset for the segmentation and detection of small brain tumors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".