MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4406698577 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae190.1295

P1121 Longterm Outcomes of Balloon Assisted Endoscopic Stricture Dilation in Patients with Small Bowel Crohn’s Disease: A Tertiary Referral Center’s Retrospective Experience

2025· article· en· W4406698577 on OpenAlexaffabout
Brendan P. Halloran, Joel Bowron, Amara Fazal, Karen I. Kroeker, Karen Wong, Frank Hoentjen, D Parsons, Farhad Peerani, M Gozdzik, Shawn Wasilenko, Sergio Zepeda-Gómez

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCrohn's diseaseBalloon dilationRetrospective cohort studyTertiary referral centreInflammatory bowel diseaseSurgeryBalloonGeneral surgeryDiseaseInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The natural history Crohn’s disease (CD) can be complicated by strictures. Balloon-assisted endoscopy (BAE) has significantly improved the ability to assess and treat small bowel CD, allowing for stricture dilation to improve patient symptoms and potentially delay or avoid surgery. We present a single-centre CD cohort of patients that have undergone BAE for stricture dilation. We assess procedural success, outcomes and safety, evaluate factors associated with a risk of requiring surgical management. Methods All patient who underwent BAE for CD from the period oof April 2012 to January 2024 were assessed and recorded. Within this group, we identified patients who had undergone assessment and/or dilation of structuring CD. Patient demographic and procedural details were extracted. Long-term outcomes, including requirement for repeat dilation and requirement for surgery were recorded from time initial of initial BAE as surrogates for the durability of dilation in these patients. Patients required surgery post initial BAE were compared to the non-surgical group. Results At the University of Alberta Hospital, out of 532 BAE procedures in 231 patients, 157 pt underwent 282 BAE procedures with 629 strictures dilated. In our cohort, 16 strictures were non-traversable and 3 were failed dilations. We had a > 95% successful dilation rate. One perforation occurred requiring emergent surgery (n=1). 65 pts required surgery and 92 pts were managed with dilation. and pharmacotherapy. Overall, 28/65 patients were active smokers (43.08%) in the surgical group vs. 24/92 (26.09%). Biologic use was comparable (76.9% vs 73.9%). The average minimum diameter dilated was lower 15.2 mm (+/- 0.25) vs 16.2 mm(+/- 0.16) in the surgical group. Non-traversable strictures post-dilation was higher in the surgical group (14.72% vs 9.20%). A total 65 patients undersent surgery with an average time of 32.22 months (excluding emergent/urgent surgeries) from index BAE and avg 8.79 months from most recent BAE. There was a total of 3 emergent surgeries (<24 hours from BAE to surgery, including one perforation from intraprocedural complication), 7 urgent surgeries (<30 days from BAE to surgery). Conclusion Based on this cohort, the majority of patients with CD strictures CD can be successfully managed with BAE stricture dilation, and in those requiring surgery the average time from initial BAE to surgery was 32 months. BAE stricture dilation may play an important role in preventing emergent/unplanned surgical interventions and preventing surgeries in select patients. Although this study is currently descriptive, further data analysis of this group is ongoing currently.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→