MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406699197 · doi:10.1093/skinhd/vzae016

Disseminated blastomycosis with cutaneous involvement in a young man in Ottawa, Canada

2025· article· en· W4406699197 on OpenAlexaffabout
J.L. Turk, Laura D Chin, Stephanie Petkiewicz, Steven J. Glassman

Bibliographic record

VenueSkin Health and Disease · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFungal Infections and Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlastomycosisDermatologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dear Editor, Blastomycosis is a deep fungal infection caused by Blastomyces dermatitidis, typically starting in the lungs and potentially spreading to the skin.1 Diagnosis of skin lesions is challenging due to similarity to inflammatory and infectious dermatoses.2 A healthy 26-year-old man with a cough and pleuritic pain showed consolidation on X-ray and was initially treated for pneumonia. One month later, he developed crusted verrucous plaques (Figure 1a). Biopsy revealed fungal organisms in giant cells (Figure 1b), highlighted by silver staining (Figure 1c). He was treated with itraconazole for 6 months with follow-up. Early recognition and treatment are essential in preventing complications of blastomycosis. Clinical and histopathological findings in a patient with cutaneous blastomycosis. (a) Verrucous crusted plaques on the face show a cutaneous presentation of blastomycosis. (b) Haematoxylin and eosin staining shows pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia with mixed inflammatory infiltrates including multinucleated giant cells. The arrow points toward a fungal organism within the giant cell. (c) Silver staining highlights fungal organisms within histiocytes. This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. No new data were generated or analysed in support of this research. Not applicable. Written patient consent for publication was obtained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.363
Threshold uncertainty score0.435

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSkin Health and DiseaseSame topicFungal Infections and StudiesFrench-language works237,207