P0748 Characterisation of Remission Levels in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis Treated with 5-Aminosalicylates: Results of the CARUC-ASA Prospective Multicentre Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background The treatment goals for chronic inflammatory bowel diseases are increasingly ambitious, targeting steroid-free remission, mucosal healing, and biomarker normalisation. In ulcerative colitis (UC), histological remission lowers risks of hospitalisation, cancer, and relapse. This study aims to describe remission levels in UC patients in symptomatic remission on first-line 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) and factors associated with remission. Methods This national, multicentre, prospective, phase 4 interventional study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05992142) included UC patients in symptomatic remission, defined by a stool frequency score ≤ 1 and no rectal bleeding, on 5-ASA monotherapy (oral and/or rectal) for at least 6 months. Patients on corticosteroids, immunomodulators, biologics, or small molecules were excluded. Assessments included stool frequency, rectal bleeding, urgency, rectosigmoidoscopy (Mayo score, UCEIS), biopsies with the Geboes score assessed by central reading, faecal calprotectin (FCP), and MARS (Medication Adherence Report Scale) questionnaire. The different levels of remission were defined as followed: Complete Symptomatic Remission (CSR: PRO-2 = 0, no urgency), Endoscopic Remission (ER: Mayo 0–1, UCEIS 0–1), Complete Endoscopic Remission (CER: Mayo 0, UCEIS 0–1), Histological Remission (HR: Geboes 0–1), and FCP <150 μg/g; and Deep Remission as combined CCR, CER, and HR. In the absence of CER, physicians completed a questionnaire to investigate the reasons for not altering therapy. Results From December 2022 to February 2024, 198 UC patients (median age 50, 41% female) were enrolled from 14 centres. Montreal classifications were E1 (37%), E2 (44%), and E3 (18%). Treatment included oral 5-ASA (n=134, 68%), rectal 5-ASA (n=19, 9%), and a combination (n=45, 23%) with a median duration of 2.0 years (1.0 - 4.0). The median MARS-5 score was 24. ER was observed in 172/198 patients (87%), CER in 138/198 (70%), and HR in 156/196 (80%). Among those in ER and CER, 151/172 (88%) and 127/137 (93%) also had HR, respectively. Normal FCP was seen in 152/194 (78%) and in 128/153 (83%) of the HR subgroup. Deep remission was achieved in 47/197 (24%) of patients. The main reason for absence of deep remission was the absence of CSR (63%). The main reason for not altering treatment, despite the absence of CER, was physician reluctance in 37% of cases. 5-ASA administration form was significantly associated with ER (p=0.5, OR=2.9, 95%CI 1.1-7.3) for oral against combined. Conclusion In UC patients in clinical remission on 5-ASA, the majority achieved endoscopic and/or histological remission, suggesting that higher remission levels beyond clinical remission alone are attainable in selected, highly adherent patients on first-line therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".