P0989 Interventions for rheumatological extraintestinal manifestations in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: an umbrella review of systematic reviews
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) is associated with extraintestinal manifestations (EIMs), commonly affecting the joints, eyes, skin, and liver, and influences treatment selection. We aimed to synthesize evidence from systematic reviews (SRs) with or without meta-analyses on the efficacy of therapeutic options for rheumatological EIMs to better clarify their positioning in the management of IBD Methods We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic inception to May 31 2024 to identify SRs addressing therapeutic interventions for rheumatological EIMs. The exclusion criteria ruled out studies that were not SRs, did not focus on patients with IBD patients, or were unrelated to articular interventions. Screening, selection, and data extraction were performed independently by two authors, with a third author consulted when necessary. Reporting was aligned with PRISMA standards. The quality of SRs was assessed using the AMSTAR-2 tool Results We screened 1,436 references and included 10 SRs (2 with meta-analyses) in our analysis. The rheumatological EIMs most commonly reported included arthralgia, peripheral arthropathy, axial arthropathy, spondyloarthritis, and sacroiliitis. Therapeutic interventions included in the SRs were anti-TNF agents, methotrexate (MTX), ustekinumab, (UST) vedolizumab (VDZ), and JAK inhibitors. Treatment efficacy was mainly reported through symptom reduction rates. Quality of the SRs rated from high to very low confidence, with most achieving moderate confidence due to some non-critical weaknesses. In four SRs anti-TNF therapy showed high response rates for both axial (range 59.1% to 61.8% in a SR) and peripheral spondyloarthritis (range 73.4% to 81.2% in a SR). One SR reported MTX as effective for peripheral enteropathic arthritis. Data on VDZ, UST, and JAK inhibitors were more controversial. One SR reported that UST was effective for arthralgia and psoriatic arthritis. A more recent meta-analysis showed that the improvement of pre-existing joint manifestations was greater in UST-treated patients compared to VDZ-treated patients (54% vs 42%). For tofacitinib, no change in peripheral arthritis was reported by two SRs. Four SRs evaluated treatment-induced rheumatological EIMs, revealing heterogeneous results, particularly with VDZ. However, data from a recent SRs suggest similar rates of new-onset rheumatological EIMs with VDZ and UST (9% vs. 6%) Conclusion Anti-TNF therapy appears to be effective in managing both peripheral and axial spondyloarthritis. Given the lack of consistent data on new advanced therapies, prospective studies designed to assess the impact of other advances therapeutics on rheumatological EIMs ,with rigorous endpoint assessment, are needed
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.030 | 0.132 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.014 | 0.010 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.022 | 0.025 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".