Investigation of 3D steel frames with a reduced beam section and various web-opening shapes under internal column loss
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The sudden loss of columns due to abnormal loads demonstrates a remarkable example of a localized failure that might ultimately result in the progressive collapse of the complete steel-framed structures. In this study, finite element (FE) simulations are implemented by utilizing ABAQUS-Explicit to investigate the progressive collapse of two-storey steel reduced beam section (RBS) frames with web openings. The reliability and accuracy of the FE models are validated by comparing the obtained results with currently available experimental test results. A numerical investigation is conducted on twenty-eight RBS frames, each with a distinct web opening form (i.e. circular, square, and hexagon holes), different sizes of (D = 75, 90, and 105 mm), and varying distances of (25, 50, and 100 mm) from the center of the flange-reduced to the web opening. The failure modes, load-displacement characteristics, and development of catenary action are evaluated. The results showed that the specimens with square holes showed a greater degree of damage and lower load-carrying capacity compared with the specimens that have circle and hexagonal holes. In addition, an increased opening size resulted in a decrease in load-bearing capacity at small distances, thereby resulting in an increased capacity at a large distance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it