MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4406704017 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae190.0465

P0291 Tailoring Crohn’s disease surveillance after ileocolic resection: the importance of inflammatory biomarkers

2025· article· en· W4406704017 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
A I Ferreira, Tiago Lima Capela, Sofıa Xavier, Cátia Arieira, Jorge Cotter

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCrohn's diseaseInflammatory bowel diseaseDiseaseIntestinal resectionResectionInternal medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Recurrence of Crohn’s disease (CD) after ileocolic resection is common. However, reliable non-invasive monitoring methods are lacking, for instance, the use of faecal calprotectin (FC) has showed inconsistent results in this subgroup of patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical and biochemical factors associated with post-operative endoscopic recurrence in CD patients. Methods Retrospective single-center study including patients with CD who underwent ileocolonoscopy for CD surveillance, after ileocolic resection. The patients’ clinical status was evaluated through Harvey-Bradshaw index (HBI), with clinical remission considered as ≤ 4 points. Biochemical parameters included erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), c-reactive protein (CRP) and FC. Clinical and biochemical parameters were evaluated in the 6 months prior to ileocolonoscopy. Post-operative endoscopic recurrence was defined as a Rutgeerts score ≥ i2b. Results A total of 81 patients and 121 ileocolonoscopies were included. Most patients were female (55.6%), with a mean age of 48±13 years. Regarding the Montreal classification, 37 patients had ileal disease (45.7%) and 44 ileocolonic disease (54.3%); 9 patients had nonstricturing, nonpenetrating disease (11.1%), 35 stricturing (43.2%) and 37 penetrating disease (45.7%). Nineteen patients had perianal disease (23.5%). The mean time between the surgery and the endoscopic evaluation was 135±79 months. Post-operative endoscopic recurrence was observed in 52 ileocolonoscopies (43.0%). Symptomatic patients (HBI > 4 points) were 11 times more likely to have post-operative endoscopic recurrence (OR 10.686, 95%CI 2.930-38.974, p<0.001). Those with post-operative endoscopic recurrence had a significantly higher FC values (median 189 vs 69 µg/g, p<0.001) and higher ESR values (median 14 vs 9 mm, p=0.002). In fact, patients with FC values ≥ 150 µg/g and those with ESR values > 12 mm were 4 and 3 times more likely to have post-operative endoscopic recurrence (OR 3.654, 95%CI 1.605-8.316, p=0.002 and OR 3.059, 95%CI 1.397-6.696, p=0.005, respectively). The presence of post-operative endoscopic recurrence was not associated with CRP values (median 2.9 vs 2.9 mg/L, p=0.466), and neither with mean time between the surgery and the endoscopic evaluation (mean 126±83 vs 142±75 months, p=0.263). Conclusion The presence of symptoms (HBI > 4 points), FC values ≥ 150 µg/g and ESR values > 12 mm was associated with post-operative endoscopic recurrence in CD. Therefore, the HBI, FC and ESR values can be used to monitor CD patients after ileocolic resection, and prompt endoscopic evaluation should be performed in those with HBI > 4 points, FC values ≥ 150 µg/g and/or ESR values > 12 mm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→