MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4406705037 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae190.0033

OP33 Efficacy and safety of subcutaneous guselkumab induction therapy in patients with moderately to severely active Crohn’s disease: Results through Week 48 from the phase 3 GRAVITI study

2025· article· en· W4406705037 on OpenAlexaff
A Hart, Remo Panaccione, Flávio Steinwurz, Silvio Danese, Takashi Hisamatsu, Qian Cao, Mobolaji Olurinde, M Vetter, Zijiang Yang, Yin Wang, J Johanns, Natalie A. Terry, B E Sands, Geert D’Haens

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCrohn's diseaseInduction therapyDiseaseInternal medicineSurgeryChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Guselkumab (GUS) is a dual-acting IL-23p19 subunit inhibitor that was efficacious in phase 3 trials (GALAXI 2/3) of pts with CD using IV induction and SC maintenance. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of GUS SC induction/maintenance in GRAVITI, a phase 3 treat-through trial in pts with moderately to severely active CD. Methods Eligible pts had a history of inadequate response or intolerance to oral corticosteroids, AZA, 6-MP, MTX, or biologics (BIO-IR). Randomization was stratified by baseline (BL) CDAI, SES-CD, and BIO-IR status, with 347 pts allocated 1:1:1 to GUS 400mg SC q4w (x3)→GUS 200mg SC q4w (N=115), GUS 400mg SC q4w (x3)→GUS 100mg SC q8w (N=115), or PBO (N=117). Pts were rescued at Wk16: PBO pts switched to GUS, and GUS pts stayed on GUS per treat-through design (sham rescue). The co-primary endpoints were clinical remission at Wk12 and endoscopic response at Wk12. Other multiplicity-controlled endpoints were clinical remission at Wk24, PRO-2 remission at Wk12, clinical response at Wk12, clinical remission at Wk48, and endoscopic response at Wk48. All endpoints assessed through Wk12 compared the combined GUS 400mg SC treatment arm to PBO; assessments after Wk12 compared each GUS SC maintenance regimen to PBO. All pts who met rescue criteria were considered not to have met efficacy endpoints after Wk16. Safety was assessed through Wk48. Results BL characteristics were similar across groups (overall mean age, 37.5yrs; mean CD disease duration, 8.0yrs; mean CDAI, 296.9; mean SES-CD, 12.0; BIO-IR, 46.4%). The co-primary and all multiplicity-controlled endpoints were met. GUS 400mg SC induction demonstrated superiority to PBO at Wk12. Both SC maintenance dose regimens were also superior to PBO at Wks 24 and 48 (Figure). In prespecified analyses of subpopulations defined by prior biologic history, greater proportions of GUS-treated pts achieved the endpoints than PBO. Key safety event rates per 100 pt years through Wk48 were similar among groups (Table). Proportions of GUS-treated pts experiencing ≥1 serious AE or AE leading to discontinuation of study agent were not greater than PBO. The numbers of GUS-treated pts with serious infections or AEs of special interest were low. Conclusion GRAVITI established the efficacy of GUS SC induction followed by SC maintenance in CD. These results build on the GALAXI 2/3 data and demonstrate that both IV and SC induction are efficacious. Safety findings were consistent with the known safety profile of GUS in approved indications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→