MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406705087 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae190.0144

DOP105 Patient-reported quality of life in moderate-to-severe Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis: Insights from the communicating needs and features of IBD experiences (CONFIDE) survey

2025· article· en· W4406705087 on OpenAlexaff
Stefan Schreiber, Toshihumi Hibi, Alison Potts Bleakman, Simon Travis, Remo Panaccione, Marla C. Dubinsky, C Kayhan, Tommaso Panni, Angelo D. Favia, Edward J. Flynn, Christian Atkinson, David T. Rubin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUlcerative colitisCrohn's diseaseInflammatory bowel diseaseDiseaseQuality of life (healthcare)DermatologyGastroenterologyColitisInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Improving health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is a long-term treatment goal for Crohn’s disease (CD) and Ulcerative colitis (UC).1 The CONFIDE study explored patients’ perspectives on the experiences and impact of CD and UC-related symptoms in the US, Europe (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and UK), and Japan. Here, we assessed HRQoL among patients with CD or UC using the Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (SIBDQ). Methods Online, quantitative, cross-sectional surveys were conducted among patients with moderate-to-severe CD or UC, defined by criteria based on previous treatment, steroid use, and/or hospitalisation. SIBDQ is a 10-item self-reported questionnaire assessing HRQoL within the past 2 weeks across bowel and systemic symptoms and emotional and social function.2,3 Each item is scored on a 7-point Likert scale (1=severe problem to 7=no problem); higher scores indicate better HRQoL.4 Patients were asked ‘How severe do you think your CD or UC is currently?’ and rated disease severity as mild/moderate/severe/don’t know. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise data. Results The analysis included 547 European (males [M]=55%, mean age=38 years [yrs]), 215 US (M=55%, 41 yrs), and 99 Japanese (M=68%, 43 yrs) patients with CD and 556 European (M=57%, 39 yrs), 200 US (M=62%, 40 yrs),and 124 Japanese (M=70%, 49 yrs) patients with UC. Of these, 347 (63%) European, 125 (58%) US, and 86 (87%) Japanese patients with CD, and 301 (54%) European, 153 (77%) US, and 52 (42%) Japanese patients with UC were receiving advanced therapies at data collection. Mean SIBDQ total scores were 4.1, 4.0, and 5.1 for European, US, and Japanese patients with CD, and 4.1, 3.9, and 5.6 for those with UC. Scores were similar across all SIBDQ domains and among patients receiving advanced therapies. Japanese patients reported numerically higher mean (SD) SIBDQ total and domain scores than European and US patients (Figure 1). In Europe and the US, patients who perceived their CD and UC as moderate or severe had numerically lower mean SIBDQ scores than those with mild disease perceptions. Japanese patients reported numerically higher mean SIBDQ scores than European and US patients, regardless of perceived disease severity (Figure 2). Conclusion Despite receiving advanced therapies, patients with CD or UC reported impaired HRQoL as measured by the SIBDQ, with Japanese patients reporting better HRQoL than European and US patients. This may stem from differences in characteristics of survey respondents, environment (e.g., bathroom access) and healthcare. Mean SIBDQ scores suggest that patients who perceive their CD or UC to be more severe report worse HRQoL. References 1. Al Khoury A, Balram B, Bessissow T, et al. Dig Dis Sci. 2022;67(6):1956-1974. 2. Irvine EJ, Zhou Q, Thompson AK. Am J Gastroenterol. 1996;91(8):1571-1578. 3. Yarlas A, D'Haens G, Willian MK, Teynor M. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2018;24(2):450-463. 4. Roseira J, Sousa HT, Marreiros A, Contente LF, Magro F. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021;19(1):59.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and ColitisSame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207