Planning of the Spectator Stand Structure and Steel Roof Frame Construction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The high interest in public sports in Batam City in early 2020, such as basketball, volleyball, and badminton, has an impact on the high activity of using sports facilities or sports fields. However, it is not accompanied by the availability of sufficient sports fields. The author conducted research, namely planning sports facilities that include 3 sports games that at the same time can minimize the use of such a large area. It, later, can be used as a multifunctional sports facility. The author conducted a field planning with a length of 36 m and a width of 28.3 m. The author planned the structure of the sports field spectator stands using a steel roof frame following the provisions of the Indonesian National Standard. The loads put into the steel roof truss structure were in the form of dead loads, live loads, and wind loads. The dead load includes CNP profic load, spandex roof, and the live load includes rainwater load. The material structure used was the IWF steel column with size 400 x 400 x 120 kg/m and steel roof with IWF size 500 x 200 x 103 kg / m. The author analyzed the structure using the SAP2000 program. The results of plate analysis using SAP2000 that withstand a live load of 500 kg/ m² and a dead load of 62 kg.m², can withstand a given load and plate reinforcement using D10-170. The results of beam analysis in SAP2000 and beam planning calculations were the beam can support the existing structure and receive Mu of 2.72 kNm, beam reinforcement uses 2D12 and the block beam uses Ø6-140. The author expects the planning made can be useful for Civil Engineering students and others as a reference or guideline in planning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".