MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406724991 · doi:10.3389/fneur.2024.1513160

The vagal rhizopathies

2025· review· en· W4406724991 on OpenAlexaffabout
Christopher R. Honey

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Neurology · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory and Cough-Related Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVagus nerveMicrovascular decompressionAnesthesiaCranial nervesNeurovascular bundleBrainstemSurgeryInternal medicineTrigeminal neuralgia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neurovascular compression of the tenth cranial nerve, the vagus nerve, can cause recognizable and neurosurgically treatable clinical conditions. This chapter will outline the clinical characteristics unique to vagus nerve compression and highlight both the definitive diagnostic protocol and neurosurgical treatment of these conditions. The vagus nerve has motor, sensory and autonomic components. Neurovascular compression of the motor component can cause hemi-laryngopharyngeal spasm (HELPS syndrome). Compression of the sensory component will cause a neurogenic cough called VANCOUVER syndrome - an acronym for Vagus Associated Neurogenic Cough Occurring due to Unilateral Vascular Compression of its Root. Both are caused by direct compression of the root of the tenth cranial nerve at the brainstem by a blood vessel and can be cured by microvascular decompression (MVD). Since the symptoms of choking and cough are common and blood vessels are often abutting the vagus nerve at the brainstem, it is vitally important to understand the definitive diagnostic protocol to avoid operating on false positives. Since the vagus nerve is far more susceptible to dysfunction during surgery than either the trigeminal or facial nerves, it is also important to understand the surgical nuances of this procedure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in NeurologySame topicRespiratory and Cough-Related ResearchFrench-language works237,207