MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4406727484 · doi:10.56952/igs-2024-0516

Smart Coupled Flow-Geomechanical Upscaling Technique for Oil Sands

2024· article· en· W4406727484 on OpenAlexaffabout
Xiaoyan Ou, Shuxin Qiao, Bo Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetroleum engineeringOil sandsGeomechanicsGeotechnical engineeringFlow (mathematics)GeologyComputer scienceMechanicsMaterials scienceAsphalt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT: Interbedded shales play a critical role in the flow-geomechanics of reservoirs, influencing slope stability of open-pit mining, as well as steam chamber propagation and caprock integrity in steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) operations used to extract bitumen from oil sands. However, conventional flow-geomechanics analyses often rely on oversimplified assumptions (homogeneity and isotropy) for interbedded shales in the Alberta oil sands. This is largely due to a limited understanding of the complex fluid flow and geomechanical interactions within these heterogeneous oil sand reservoirs. A robust and efficient geomechanical upscaling technique is essential for advancing the application of three-dimensional (3D) reservoir-scale geomechanical simulations that account for detailed geological heterogeneities. The objective of this study is to propose an innovative upscaling technique using a 3D convolutional neural network (3D CNN) that computes upscaled geomechanical properties directly from geological realizations. This approach significantly reduces the computational time of coupled fluid flow and geomechanical simulations while accurately reproducing the stress-strain behavior, volumetric strain, plastic strain and pore pressure changes of heterogeneous oil sands under partially drained condition during SAGD operation and open-pit mining of oil sands. 1. INTRODUCTION Interbedded shales, also termed as inclined heterolithic stratification (IHS), are widely distributed in the Alberta oil sands and create significant heterogeneities in both reservoir and caprock (Thomas et al. 1987). The interbedded shales act as flow barriers that hinder steam chamber development in SAGD operations. The long and continuous mud layers can form critical slip planes, leading to slope instability in open-pit mining of oil sands (Hein, 2017). Understanding and accurately modeling these geological heterogeneities are essential for efficient bitumen extraction from oil sands, necessitating advanced techniques to optimize production performance and ensure operational safety (Thomas et al., 1987). In the Wabiskaw Member and McMurray Formation of Alberta oil sands, coupled flow-geomechanical models help address challenges posed by geological heterogeneities like Inclined Heterolithic Stratification (IHS) (Darymple et al., 2007; Van den Berg et al., 2007; Martinius et al., 2011). Early upscaling techniques are focused on homogenization of geomechanical properties considering microscopic heterogeneities in a Representative Elementary Volume (REV) (Hill, 1963, Drugan et al., 1996). To further investigate the impact of heterogeneities across different scales, Multiscale Finite Element Methods (MsFEM) were developed to solve fine-scale problems within a coarse-scale framework without explicitly modeling the entire fine-scale system. (Hou et al, 1997, Efendiev et al., 2004). Fine-scale simulations, which perform detailed analyses on small-scale models and average the results (Durlofsky, 2005), have been further advanced by recent research employing machine learning and high-performance computing to address the challenge in multiscale simulations and to predict the constitutive geomechanical response of the REV at the microscopic scale (Ghaboussi et al., 1991, Hkdh, 1999, Koutsourelakis, 2007, Qu et al., 2021a, 2023, Wu et al., 2023).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDrilling and Well Engineering→French-language works237,207→