MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406732046 · doi:10.2138/am-2024-9561

Reconstructing volatile evolution in melts using zircon-hosted apatite inclusions: Implications for the use of apatite as a fertility indicator

2025· article· en· W4406732046 on OpenAlexaff
Qiang Li, Xiang Sun, Jun Deng, Yunzhao Ge, Xiaobo Si, Xu Zheng, Pete Hollings

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Mineralogist · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicIsotope Analysis in Ecology
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsApatiteZirconGeologyMineralogyGeochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Porphyry Cu deposits are genetically associated with oxidized, hydrous, and volatile-rich (e.g., Cl, S) magmas. Magmatic volatiles play a crucial role in the fertility of magmas associated with porphyry Cu mineralization. A continuous, volatile record from volatile undersaturation to fluid saturation in the magma reservoir is significant for understanding the genesis of porphyry Cu deposits. Apatite serves as a reliable recorder of the magmatic-hydrothermal history in porphyry Cu systems, with its volatile evolution providing an effective method for identifying the occurrence of volatile saturation. In this study, we measure the compositions of apatites occurring as inclusions in various minerals, including zircons, in both fresh and altered pre-mineralization monzogranite and inter-mineralization monzogranite porphyry from the Zhunuo porphyry Cu deposit in the Gangdese belt, southern Tibet. Cathodoluminescence and composition reveal significant differences between unaltered and hydrothermally altered apatites. Primary magmatic apatites exhibit homogeneous yellow to brown luminescence, whereas hydrothermally altered apatites display a wide range of distinctive luminescence colors (e.g., dull yellow-green, green, and gray). Furthermore, primary magmatic apatites show a significantly higher Mn/Fe ratio (>1.5) and rare earth element (REE) plus Y contents (>4500 ppm) compared to hydrothermally altered apatites (Mn/Fe < 1.5, REE+Y < 4500 ppm). Zircon-hosted apatite inclusions demonstrate decreasing XCl/XOH ratios (∼1.0–0.2) with increasing XF/XOH (2–11) and XF/XCl (4–48) ratios, indicating volatile exsolution during or prior to zircon crystallization in the magma chamber. Phenocryst-hosted apatite inclusions and groundmass apatite crystals have comparable volatile compositions, characterized by higher XF/XOH (5–25) and XF/XCl (15–75) but lower XCl/XOH (mostly <0.3) compared to zircon-hosted apatites. We infer that the phenocryst-hosted apatite inclusions may have formed during/after fluid exsolution or may not escape re-equilibration with the residual melt due to the less robust nature of their silicate hosts. The calculated melt Cl contents, derived from low-XF/XCl zircon-hosted apatites in the monzogranite porphyry are 0.17 ± 0.06 wt%, overlapping with those of the monzogranite (0.12 ± 0.04 wt%). The relatively high Cl contents of primary ore-forming magmas likely facilitate the effective extraction of Cu from the melt into the hydrothermal fluid. Our study highlights that apatite-in-zircon is more valuable than non-zircon-hosted apatite grains for reconstructing melt volatile evolution and could be a better Cu-fertility indicator for porphyry Cu mineralization than other forms of apatite.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.970

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican MineralogistSame topicIsotope Analysis in EcologyFrench-language works237,207