MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406738454 · doi:10.11159/ijepr.2025.001

Analysis of Genotypic and Environmental Risk Factors for the Development of Allergic Diseases in Almaty Residents

2025· article· en· W4406738454 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Madina Abdullayeva, Nazym Altynova, Saida Tokmurzina, Tamerlan Kereyev, Aigerim Kassymbekova, Yergali Kanagat, Dmitri Gourevitch, Danara Artygaliyeva, Leyla Djansugurova

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Environmental Pollution and Remediation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHuman Health and Disease
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenotypeMedicineEnvironmental healthBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Allergic diseases represent a global health problems. According to the "Association of Allergists and ClinicalImmunologists" of Kazakhstan, the number of allergy sufferers in the country increases by 10-15% every year.Microarray genotyping has been widely used in allergy diagnosis due to its high throughput capability and specificity in identifying genetic markers associated with allergic diseases.This work is aimed to study the dynamics of the incidence of allergic diseases among residents of Almaty; assess the role of environmental and genotypic risk factors; identify marker genes related to asthma and allergic rhinitis and risk assessment in case and controls among patients.The findings revealed that allergic rhinitis was the most prevalent condition (58%), followed by bronchial asthma (9%).Self-reported allergy data were often inconsistent with medical diagnoses, underscoring the importance of clinical confirmation.A family history of allergies emerged as a major risk factor, significantly outweighing the impact of smoking.Genetic analysis identified specific SNPs in the IL13 and IL12B genes that were associated with increased allergy risk.For IL13, the T allele of rs1295686, A allele of rs848, and A allele of rs20541 were identified as significant.In IL12B, the T allele of rs2853694 and CC genotype of rs2569254 were linked to higher risk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.172

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Environmental Pollution and RemediationSame topicHuman Health and DiseaseFrench-language works237,207