Potential effects of introduced salmonids on native lake trout <i>Salvelinus namaycush</i> in Lake Huron: evaluating niche overlap using stable isotopes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Lake Huron fish community is comprised of many non-native species, including the piscivorous Pacific salmonids chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawtscha, coho salmon Oncorhynchus kisutch, and rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss. The only abundant native piscivorous salmonid is the lake trout Salvelinus namaycush. Since 1980, there has been a steady decline in the biomass of the prey fishes these salmonids consume. Considering the collapse of alewife Alosa pseudoharengus in 2003, there has been growing concern that lake trout will be outcompeted by the non-native salmonids. Paramount to understanding this concern is determining the diet overlap between salmonids and how the overlap has shifted with changes in prey abundance. Here, stable isotope analyses (δ13C, δ15N) from lipid-extracted muscle tissues were compared among salmonids revealing large percentages of lake-wide isotopic niche overlap. Comparisons of these isotopes from salmonid scale samples taken before and after the alewife collapse revealed a shift in the diets of chinook salmon that now overlap with lake trout. Given the strong competitiveness of chinook salmon, this result is concerning for the management of the native lake trout.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".