Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sport and human movement can be expressions of embodied freedom in response to the violence of settler colonialism that reproduces racism, transphobia, ableism, and other systems of supremacy (McGuire-Adams et al., 2022). For example, Palestinians and allies have taken up direct action through the body, in a wave of global protests against the Israeli State's genocidal occupation of Palestine (Al Jazeera, 2023a). In this paper, I offer two arguments: 1) decolonial queer theory illuminates the racialized and sexualized tactics of the Israeli occupation; and 2) a decolonial queer framework within kinesiology can serve as a tool for analyzing the intersections of movement, identity, and decolonization in research. To support my argument, first I provide background research on the occupation of Palestine (Said, 1979). Second, I synthesize literature on decolonial queer theories concerning the liberation of Palestine, since “sexual and bodily freedom cannot be separated from the fight against Israeli colonialism” (Alqaisiya et al., 2023, p. 115). Third, the paper provides an analysis of sport and movement in Palestine using decolonial queer theory. For kinesiology and sport sociology scholars interested in decolonial work, looking to decolonial queer theories can provide intersectional and liberatory frameworks of analysis that attend to the sexualized tactics of Israeli settler colonization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".