The Influence of Leadership Style on Employee Performance: The Role of Employee Motivation at PT AHI Tbk
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the impact of leadership style, work environment, and motivation on employee performance at PT. AHI Tbk. Using a quantitative method with a sample of 200 employees, data were analyzed using Smart PLS 3. The results indicate that leadership style has a significant effect on employee performance, with a t-statistic of 4.326 and a p-value of 0.000. Conversely, the work environment did not show a significant effect on employee performance, as evidenced by a t-statistic of 1.253 and a p-value of 0.211. Additionally, motivation did not function as a significant mediator between leadership style and employee performance. These findings suggest that improving employee performance can be achieved through the development of effective leadership styles, although the work environment aspects require further evaluation. The recommendations generated from this study include enhancing leadership training programs, improving working conditions, and focusing on employee motivation development. This research is expected to provide insights for management and stakeholders to improve employee performance through a more holistic approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it