MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406759468 · doi:10.52294/001c.128149

Consensus recommendations for clinical functional MRI applied to language mapping

2025· article· en· W4406759468 on OpenAlexaff
Natalie Voets, Manzar Ashtari, Christian F. Beckmann, Christopher Benjamin, Tammie L.S. Benzinger, Jeffrey R. Binder, Alberto Bizzi, Bruce Björnson, Edward F. Chang, Linda Douw, Jodie R. Gawryluk, Karsten Geletneky, Matthew F. Glasser, Sven Haller, Mark Jenkinson, Jorge Jovicich, Eric C. Leuthardt, Asim Mian, Thomas E. Nichols, Ōiwi Parker Jones, Cyril Pernet, Puneet Plaha, Monika Połczyńska-Bletsos, Cathy J. Price, Geert‐Jan Rutten, Michael Scheel, Joshua S. Shimony, Joanna Sierpowska, Lynne J. Williams, Ghoufran Talib, Michael Zeineh, Andreas Bartsch, Susan Y. Bookheimer

Bibliographic record

VenueAperture Neuro · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouver General Hospital
FundersMedical Research Council
KeywordsComputer sciencePsychologyMedicineMedical physicsNatural language processing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ample reports highlight fMRI's added value to guide neurosurgical interventions near brain regions supporting speech and language. However, fMRI's usefulness for clinical language mapping remains controversial, partly fueled by 1) differences from clinical standard tools it is often compared against, and 2) wide heterogeneity in how data are acquired, analyzed and interpreted. Both factors limit objective assessment of the benefits and efficacy of presurgical fMRI. This underscores the need for standardization of fMRI protocols to enable data pooling across centers and facilitate learning from patient outcomes. The OHBM Working Group on clinical fMRI language mapping was formed in 2017. Its scope was to review and propose best practice recommendations addressing specific challenges posed by applications in patient populations. Objectives were to: 1) consider language tasks and designs, optimized for specific clinical objectives, and incorporating modifications for patients with existing impairments; 2) offer practical guidance, based on high-quality research, for each step from fMRI acquisition and analysis to reporting individual patients' data. In considering these challenges we focus on implementations that have proven feasible based on approaches in active use today. When widely available practices deviate from optimal practices, we highlight emerging developments meriting further evaluation and incorporation into clinical use. This document was created in collaboration with the OHBM Committee on Best Practices, incorporating community feedback. It aims to provide a framework for improved standardization of fMRI to enable much-needed evaluations of its ultimate goals; namely, minimization of invasive intraoperative testing and, ultimately, of new post-operative language deficits. Accordingly, the single strongest recommendation is for greater transparency and reporting of longitudinal outcomes in patients undergoing clinical fMRI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.150
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.313
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.850
Threshold uncertainty score0.792

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1500.313
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.013
Bibliometrics0.0100.007
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0100.009
Open science0.0170.011
Research integrity0.0260.024
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.020

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainMethods
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAperture NeuroSame topicNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismFrench-language works237,207